Key findings

  • Luxembourg (51.0%), the Netherlands (41.3%) and the United States (40.9%) have the largest share of workers in professional or clerical jobs. Niger (1.8%), Laos (1.9%) and Tanzania (2.1%) have the smallest.
  • Across the 173 countries measured, about 372 million of 2.36 billion workers (15.8%) are professionals or clerical support workers. The typical (median) country is at 17.5%, and 31 countries are at 30% or more.
  • Income is closely linked to the share. The richest quarter of countries has a median share of 32.1%, the poorest quarter 5.5%. The rank correlation with GDP per capita is 0.88 across 167 countries. That is an association, not a cause.
  • Two of the three largest workforces sit far down the list: India (the largest) is 134th at 8.2% and Indonesia (the third largest) is 126th at 10.2%. The United States (40.9%) is above Germany (11th, 36.1%) and France (20th, 33.4%).
  • The cutoff changes little. Adding managers and technicians gives a ranking with a rank correlation of 0.97 to this one, so the order of countries barely changes.

How we measured it

WorldJobsData scores each of the nine ISCO-08 occupation groups for AI exposure on a 0 to 10 scale. Two groups score 6 or higher: Professionals (6.5) and Clerical support workers (8.5). Managers and Technicians score 5.5, and every other group scores 3.5 or lower. For each country we divide the number of workers in those two groups by total employment in the country's occupation table.

Employment comes from ILO ILOSTAT (CC BY 4.0) and national statistics offices, including Eurostat and the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Countries whose data arrives in finer sub-groups, such as Germany and the Netherlands, are rolled up to the nine major groups first, so every country is measured at the same level. Of 206 countries, 173 have all nine major groups in their occupation table. The other 33 are left out because their source tables report only seven or eight groups, so the groups cannot be compared like for like. That list includes China, Japan, Canada, South Africa and Saudi Arabia.

Data years run from 2003 to 2026: 141 of the 173 countries are on 2020 or later data, and 32 are on 2019 or earlier. The year is shown in every table below. The 6/10 cutoff is our choice, and the scores behind it are model-estimated, not measured. See the methodology and the sensitivity check below.

The 15 countries with the highest share

Rank Country Share in exposed groups Professionals Clerical Data year Workers
1Luxembourg51.0%44.7%6.3%20220.3M
2Netherlands41.3%33.1%8.2%20259.8M
3United States40.9%29.6%11.3%2025144.0M
4Israel39.2%32.7%6.5%20244.1M
5Switzerland39.1%26.9%12.2%20254.6M
6Sweden39.1%33.5%5.5%20255.3M
7Belgium38.7%26.2%12.5%20235.0M
8Ireland37.7%29.4%8.3%20252.8M
9Denmark37.4%29.8%7.6%20253.0M
10Singapore36.3%27.5%8.7%20252.3M
11Germany36.1%23.7%12.4%202542.1M
12Lithuania35.7%31.2%4.5%20251.5M
13South Korea35.6%23.1%12.5%202528.8M
14Norway35.5%29.5%6.0%20252.9M
15Australia34.8%24.1%10.7%202617.0M

Source: ILO ILOSTAT and national statistics offices, from each country's occupation table in site/data/countries/[code].json; AI exposure scores from site/data/isco_scores.json. Share = Professionals + Clerical support workers as a percentage of total employment in the table. Computed and checked 2026-10-13.

Ten of the top 15 are European. The others are the United States, Israel, Singapore, South Korea and Australia. Luxembourg's figure (51.0%) rests on 2022 data for 302,400 workers, so treat it as the least certain number in the table. The United States has 29.6% of its 144 million workers in professional jobs and 11.3% in clerical jobs, which puts it third of 173. Germany has a slightly higher clerical share (12.4%) but fewer professionals (23.7%), and lands 11th.

What the share does and does not mean

A high share means more of a country's jobs sit in the occupation groups where current AI can affect the most tasks. It does not mean those jobs will disappear. The ILO's February 2026 research brief says exposure indicators reveal technological susceptibility, not labour market outcomes. We summarise the outside evidence on actual job outcomes here.

The ten largest workforces

Rankings of small countries can mislead about where most workers actually live. The ten largest workforces in the dataset range from 5.5% to 40.9%. China and Japan are not in this table because their data does not meet the nine-group requirement described above.

Country Share in exposed groups Rank Workers Data year
India8.2%134 of 173476.6M2025
United States40.9%3 of 173144.0M2025
Indonesia10.2%126 of 173139.2M2023
Brazil21.8%66 of 173102.1M2025
Pakistan7.8%137 of 17377.6M2025
Russia31.8%24 of 17373.5M2025
Nigeria5.5%150 of 17371.4M2024
Bangladesh5.5%153 of 17369.1M2024
Mexico17.0%91 of 17359.5M2025
Vietnam9.6%130 of 17353.7M2024

India has the largest workforce in the dataset (476.6 million workers) and 8.2% of it is in the two exposed groups, which is about 39 million people. The United States has about 59 million. India's share is roughly a fifth of the US share, yet its exposed group is about 66% as large in absolute terms, because its workforce is more than three times bigger.

Income and the exposed share

Sorting 167 countries by GDP per capita (World Bank, US dollars) into four equal groups shows a steep gradient. The rank correlation between GDP per capita and the exposed share is 0.88.

GDP per capita Countries Median share Range
Below $2,694415.5%1.8% to 22.0%
$2,694 to $7,7774113.2%3.5% to 27.7%
$7,778 to $25,9064119.8%10.3% to 31.8%
$25,907 and above4432.1%14.5% to 51.0%

At the bottom of the table, agriculture and elementary work are the largest groups (see below), so the gradient largely reflects how big the farming share is. The data show where the exposed jobs are, not who gains or loses from AI. The gap between the groups is large, but each group has wide spread: the richest quarter runs from 14.5% to 51.0%.

The ten lowest

Rank Country Share in exposed groups Data year Workers
164Haiti3.5%20031.9M
165Madagascar3.3%202211.9M
166Uganda3.2%202118.0M
167Ethiopia3.2%202136.6M
168Mozambique3.1%202212.2M
169Chad2.6%20224.0M
170Burundi2.3%20205.0M
171Tanzania2.1%202431.0M
172Laos1.9%20223.5M
173Niger1.8%20229.3M

In all ten, agriculture is the largest occupation group, and agriculture plus elementary work together make up 55% to 89% of employment. In Niger, agriculture is 73.0% of employment and elementary occupations another 3.6%. In Laos the figures are 64.4% and 8.0%, in Tanzania 51.6% and 28.2%. Agriculture scores 3.0 and elementary work 2.0 out of 10 on our scale. Note the age of some of this data: Haiti's table is from 2003 and Burundi's from 2020.

Does the cutoff matter?

The 6/10 line is a judgement, so we checked two alternatives. If managers and technicians (both 5.5) are counted as well, the exposed share rises everywhere, and the leaders become Singapore (73.7%), Luxembourg (72.2%), Switzerland (65.1%), Netherlands (64.7%), United Kingdom (64.4%). The ranking changes little: the rank correlation with the main list is 0.97. If only clerical workers (8.5) are counted, the rank correlation falls to 0.82, and the top three are small territories: Réunion (22.7%), Puerto Rico (16.9%), Aruba (14.4%). The link with national income survives both alternatives: the rank correlation with GDP per capita is 0.89 with managers and technicians added and 0.81 for clerical workers alone, against 0.88 for the main measure.

The bigger caveat is the scores themselves. They were produced by an AI model on 28 May 2026, guided by published research. They are informed judgements, not measurements, so a different model or date could shift them.

What this means

If you work in a country near the top of the table, more of the workforce is in occupation groups where current AI can assist with the most tasks. Near the bottom, the same AI touches a much smaller share of paid work, and the data shows why: those economies employ most people in farming and elementary jobs. Neither situation is a forecast of job losses.

For a single country, the occupation-level breakdown, with wages and the full list of groups, is on the country pages and in the explorer.

See the full occupation breakdown for any country

See AI exposure scores broken down by every occupation group, for over 200 countries, using official ILO and national statistics data.

Open the explorer →

Was this analysis useful?

Methodology and sources. The share is the employment of ISCO-08 major groups 2 (Professionals) and 4 (Clerical support workers) divided by total employment in each country's occupation table, using the employment_thousands field of each country's own site/data/countries/[code].json file. Those two groups are the only major groups with an AI exposure score of 6/10 or higher in site/data/isco_scores.json. Countries with finer sub-group data were rolled up to major groups; 33 countries with fewer than nine major groups were excluded. Employment data is from ILO ILOSTAT (CC BY 4.0) and national statistics offices (data years 2003 to 2026); GDP per capita is from World Bank Open Data (CC BY 4.0). Rank correlations are Spearman. All figures were computed from the live data files on 2026-10-13.

AI exposure, robotics, offshoring and work-from-home scores are model-estimated: an AI language model (Claude Opus 4.7) scored each ISCO-08 occupation group on 28 May 2026, guided by published research. They are informed judgements, not measurements, and not forecasts of job losses. Read the full methodology and how the scores were checked.

Frequently asked questions

Which countries have the most workers in AI-exposed jobs?
Luxembourg leads with 51.0% of workers in professional or clerical jobs, the two groups scoring 6/10 or higher for AI exposure. The Netherlands (41.3%) and the United States (40.9%) follow.
How many workers worldwide are in AI-exposed jobs?
Across 173 countries and 2.36 billion workers, about 372 million (15.8%) work as professionals or clerical support staff. National shares range from 1.8% in Niger to 51.0% in Luxembourg.
Which countries have the fewest workers in AI-exposed jobs?
Niger (1.8%), Laos (1.9%) and Tanzania (2.1%) have the lowest shares. Agriculture and elementary work together make up 72% to 80% of employment in each, and those groups score 2 to 3 out of 10.
Where does the data come from?
Employment by occupation comes from ILO ILOSTAT and national statistics offices such as Eurostat and the US BLS, with data years from 2003 to 2026. Exposure scores are WorldJobsData model-estimated ISCO-08 group scores.

Sources

  • ILO ILOSTAT - Employment by occupation (ISCO-08), all countries (CC BY 4.0)
  • Eurostat - Labour Force Survey employment by occupation (European countries)
  • US Bureau of Labor Statistics - Occupational Outlook Handbook employment data (United States)
  • World Bank Open Data - GDP per capita (CC BY 4.0)
  • International Labour Organization (February 2026) - Workers' exposure to AI: what indicators tell us and what they don't, research brief
  • WorldJobsData (2026) - ISCO-08 AI exposure scores, model-estimated 28 May 2026 (methodology)

Spotted an error or know a better source? Report it and we will check it against the source data.