Key findings
- The link is very strong. Across 144 countries the correlation between the share of informal jobs (ILO ILOSTAT) and weighted AI exposure (WorldJobsData) is -0.89. It is the strongest of the country statistics we tested (HDI, schooling, GDP, poverty, unemployment and participation among them).
- Formal economies score higher. The 37 countries with under 20% informal jobs average 4.90 out of 10. The 48 countries with 80% or more average 3.36.
- The reason is the job mix. In the most informal group about 40% of workers farm and 13% do office-type jobs. In the most formal group it is 3% and 52%.
- Informal jobs cover most of the world's workers in our data. In these 144 countries, about 1.36 billion of 2.06 billion workers are in informal jobs (our calculation, using each country's own latest rate).
- Low exposure is not safety. Informal workers usually have no contract, savings buffer or social insurance. A low AI score only says AI is not the main thing changing their work today.
What "informal work" means
When economists say a job is informal, they mean it has no formal protection. There may be no written contract, no social security, no paid sick leave. Typical examples are a street vendor, a day labourer on a building site, a farmer working family land, or a worker at a small unregistered shop. The International Labour Organization (ILO) measures the informal share of all jobs for most countries. It ranges from about 1% in Switzerland to about 98% in Niger.
AI exposure is our own score from 0 to 10 for how much of a country's work could be done or helped by AI. We weight every occupation group's score by how many people work in it. Higher means more of the country's jobs involve the writing, calculating and information handling that AI tools can already help with.
The pattern: the more informal, the lower the score
The dots fall in a clear diagonal band. Countries such as Switzerland, Norway, Finland and Iceland sit at the top left: almost no informal jobs and exposure near 5. Countries such as Niger, Chad and Madagascar sit at the bottom right: nearly all jobs informal and exposure near 3. Every 10 points of extra informality goes along with about 0.19 fewer points of exposure, on average.
Five bands, one clear ladder
| Informal share of jobs | Countries | Average exposure | Workers covered | Farming share | Office-type share (ISCO 1-4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 20% | 37 | 4.90 | 327M | 2.7% | 52.4% |
| 20% to 39% | 15 | 4.30 | 197M | 6.3% | 39.3% |
| 40% to 59% | 24 | 3.98 | 130M | 12.4% | 30.6% |
| 60% to 79% | 20 | 3.57 | 273M | 18.5% | 21.3% |
| 80% and above | 48 | 3.36 | 1,137M | 39.8% | 12.5% |
The ladder has no gaps: each step toward more informal work lowers the average score. The most informal band is also the biggest by far, with about 1.1 billion workers in our files, and it includes India, Indonesia, Pakistan, Nigeria and Bangladesh. That is why this chart is not just about small or poor countries. It describes where most of the world's workers actually are.
Why informality tracks exposure: farms versus offices
The bars above show the main driver. In the most informal countries about 40 of every 100 workers farm. In the most formal countries it is about 3 in 100. At the same time, office-type jobs (managers, professionals, technicians and clerks) go from about 13 in 100 up to about 52. Farm work is where our scores are lowest, and office work is where they are highest, so informal economies score lower almost automatically.
That also means informality does not cause a low score. Both come from the same thing: the structure of a country's economy. When a country industrialises, its farm work shrinks, its formal jobs grow, and its AI exposure climbs along the same line.
What it looks like in the biggest economies
| Country | Informal share of jobs | Weighted AI exposure | Workers covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nigeria | 93.1% (2024) | 3.31 | 71M |
| Pakistan | 88.7% (2025) | 3.31 | 78M |
| India | 87.2% (2025) | 3.26 | 477M |
| Bangladesh | 84.0% (2024) | 3.21 | 69M |
| Indonesia | 81.0% (2023) | 3.44 | 139M |
| Vietnam | 67.0% (2024) | 3.27 | 54M |
| Mexico | 56.9% (2025) | 3.83 | 59M |
| Brazil | 35.6% (2025) | 4.13 | 102M |
| Russia | 19.2% (2025) | 4.62 | 73M |
India has the largest workforce in this list and one of the most informal (87.2%), with exposure of 3.26. Russia is the most formal of the large economies (19.2% informal) with exposure of 4.62. Brazil (35.6%) and Mexico (56.9%) sit in the middle. Rates are the latest available year for each country, so they are not all from the same year.
Countries that break the pattern
We drew the trend line and measured how far each country sits above or below it. We only used countries that report all nine major occupation groups, so that a missing group cannot distort the average.
More exposed than their informality predicts
| Country | Informal share | Actual exposure | Expected from informality | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nauru | 93.9% | 4.49 | 3.22 | +1.27 |
| Luxembourg | 6.0% | 5.87 | 4.87 | +1.00 |
| Barbados | 61.8% | 4.49 | 3.82 | +0.67 |
| Netherlands | 5.4% | 5.44 | 4.88 | +0.56 |
| United Kingdom | 19.8% | 5.08 | 4.61 | +0.47 |
Less exposed than their informality predicts
| Country | Informal share | Actual exposure | Expected from informality | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grenada | 48.0% | 3.24 | 4.08 | -0.84 |
| Tunisia | 36.9% | 3.61 | 4.29 | -0.68 |
| Romania | 2.4% | 4.26 | 4.93 | -0.67 |
| Ethiopia | 77.7% | 2.94 | 3.53 | -0.59 |
| Bahamas | 18.2% | 4.15 | 4.64 | -0.49 |
The largest gaps are about 1.3 points on the 10-point scale, but they are rare. 137 of the 139 countries in this check land within one point of the line, and the typical country sits 0.17 points from it.
What this means for workers
There is a common misreading of numbers like these: "informal workers are safe from AI." Our scores do not say that. A street vendor in Niamey is not in a job AI can do, but the vendor also has no unemployment insurance, no pension and no employer who can retrain them. If AI changes the economy around them, for example by changing what customers buy or what factories hire for, they have little cushion.
For countries with large informal workforces, the more realistic AI question is not "which jobs vanish" but "who benefits from tools like translation, voice assistants and phone-based services." In formal economies the question is the opposite: which office tasks change first, and how fast can workers move.
Limits to keep in mind
- Different years. Informality is the latest year ILO has for each country, from 2009 to 2025. 22 of the 144 countries use a year before 2019.
- Correlation is not cause. See above: both come from the structure of the economy.
- Scores are model-estimated. They describe how much of an occupation could be done with AI, not how much will be.
- Coverage. 62 of 206 countries have no informality figure in our files, and are not included.
See any country's informality and AI exposure
Open a country page to see its job mix, its informal share and its occupation-level AI scores.
Open the explorer →informal_employment_rate, latest year available, 2009 to 2025). AI exposure is each country's weighted average exposure (stats.weighted_avg_ai_exposure), from occupation scores weighted by employment (ILO ILOSTAT and national statistics offices). We compared the 144 countries that have both. Correlation is Pearson's r. Band averages are simple averages of countries. Farming and office-type shares use the countries that report all nine ISCO major groups (139 of 144). Billions of informal workers multiply each country's rate by its total employment, so they mix years. All of these are our calculations.
AI exposure scores are model-estimated: an AI language model (Claude Opus 4.7) scored each ISCO-08 occupation group on 28 May 2026, guided by published research. They are informed judgements, not measurements, and not forecasts of job losses. Read the full methodology and how the scores were checked.
Frequently asked questions
What is informal employment?
Do countries with more informal jobs have lower AI exposure?
Does low AI exposure mean informal workers are safe?
Why are formal economies more exposed to AI?
Get new country analyses, data updates, and AI labour market insights. No spam - one email when something worth reading drops.
Sources
- ILO (2026) - ILOSTAT, informal employment rate by country, latest available year (CC BY 4.0)
- ILO and national statistics offices - employment by occupation, latest available year per country (CC BY 4.0)
- WorldJobsData (2026) - Occupation-level AI exposure scores, methodology
Spotted an error or know a better source? Report it and we will check it against the source data.