All Occupations Ranked by AI Exposure
36 ISCO-08 occupation groups · data year 2022 · Tier B Employment and AI scores from Eurostat (no wages)
| ISCO | Occupation Group | AI Exposure | Robotics Risk | WFH Potential | Employment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | General and keyboard clerks | 9.0/10 | 2.0/10 | 9.0/10 | 7K |
| 25 | Information and communications technology professionals | 8.5/10 | 1.0/10 | 9.5/10 | 15K |
| 42 | Customer services clerks | 8.5/10 | 4.0/10 | 8.0/10 | 4K |
| 43 | Numerical and material recording clerks | 8.5/10 | 4.5/10 | 7.5/10 | 6K |
| 24 | Business and administration professionals | 8.0/10 | 1.5/10 | 9.0/10 | 54K |
| 33 | Business and administration associate professionals | 7.5/10 | 1.5/10 | 8.5/10 | 28K |
| 35 | Information and communications technicians | 7.5/10 | 2.5/10 | 8.5/10 | 3K |
| 21 | Science and engineering professionals | 7.0/10 | 2.0/10 | 8.0/10 | 14K |
| 26 | Legal, social and cultural professionals | 7.0/10 | 1.0/10 | 7.5/10 | 24K |
| 12 | Administrative and commercial managers | 6.5/10 | 1.5/10 | 8.0/10 | 6K |
| 23 | Teaching professionals | 6.5/10 | 1.5/10 | 6.0/10 | 18K |
| 44 | Other clerical support workers | 6.0/10 | 4.5/10 | 4.0/10 | 2K |
| 31 | Science and engineering associate professionals | 5.5/10 | 4.0/10 | 4.0/10 | 6K |
| 11 | Chief executives, senior officials and legislators | 5.0/10 | 1.0/10 | 6.5/10 | 3K |
| 13 | Production and specialised services managers | 5.0/10 | 3.5/10 | 5.0/10 | 3K |
| 22 | Health professionals | 5.0/10 | 2.5/10 | 2.0/10 | 9K |
| 32 | Health associate professionals | 5.0/10 | 4.0/10 | 2.0/10 | 5K |
| 34 | Legal, social, cultural and related associate professionals | 5.0/10 | 2.0/10 | 4.0/10 | 8K |
| 52 | Sales workers | 5.0/10 | 6.0/10 | 2.5/10 | 7K |
| 14 | Hospitality, retail and other services managers | 4.5/10 | 3.0/10 | 3.0/10 | 2K |
| 73 | Handicraft and printing workers | 4.0/10 | 5.0/10 | 2.0/10 | 1K |
| 61 | Market-oriented skilled agricultural workers | 3.5/10 | 7.0/10 | 1.0/10 | 4K |
| 74 | Electrical and electronic trades workers | 3.5/10 | 3.5/10 | 1.5/10 | 3K |
| 81 | Stationary plant and machine operators | 3.5/10 | 8.0/10 | 1.5/10 | 2K |
| 72 | Metal, machinery and related trades workers | 3.0/10 | 6.5/10 | 1.0/10 | 5K |
| 51 | Personal service workers | 2.5/10 | 5.0/10 | 1.0/10 | 11K |
| 75 | Food processing, woodworking, garment and other craft workers | 2.5/10 | 5.5/10 | 1.5/10 | 1K |
| 83 | Drivers and mobile plant operators | 2.5/10 | 7.5/10 | 0.5/10 | 10K |
| 53 | Personal care workers | 2.0/10 | 2.5/10 | 0.5/10 | 7K |
| 54 | Protective services workers | 2.0/10 | 3.5/10 | 0.5/10 | 4K |
| 71 | Building and related trades workers (excl. electricians) | 2.0/10 | 4.0/10 | 0.5/10 | 6K |
| 93 | Labourers in mining, construction, manufacturing and transport | 2.0/10 | 6.5/10 | 0.0/10 | 3K |
| 91 | Cleaners and helpers | 1.5/10 | 6.0/10 | 0.0/10 | 15K |
| 92 | Agricultural, forestry and fishery labourers | 1.5/10 | 6.0/10 | 0.0/10 | 1K |
| 94 | Food preparation assistants | 1.5/10 | 6.5/10 | 0.0/10 | 2K |
| 96 | Refuse workers and other elementary workers | 1.5/10 | 6.0/10 | 0.0/10 | 2K |
AI/robotics/WFH scores are research-based estimates (Frey-Osborne, OECD, IMF 2024), not official statistics. Hover occupation name for rationale. Employment from: Eurostat lfsa_egai2d (Eurostat open dissemination policy), OECD Average Annual Wages (USD PPP, 2024).
AI Disruption Context
World Bank indicators showing when disruption will arrive and how resilient the workforce is.
Risk Velocity
9.0/10
Disruption imminent (1-3 years)
Recovery Resilience
6.7/10
Medium resilience - partial safety net
Demographic Alignment
Transition economy
Moderate aging - automation helps productivity but may strain some sectors
Source: World Bank Open Data (CC BY 4.0) - IT.NET.BBND.P2, IT.NET.SECR.P6, HD_HCIP_OTJL_TO, SP social protection indicators.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which job is most at risk from AI in Luxembourg?
General and keyboard clerks has the highest AI exposure score in Luxembourg at 9.0/10. This occupation involves routine information handling that current AI systems can perform effectively.
What is the average AI exposure score in Luxembourg?
The workforce-weighted average AI exposure score in Luxembourg is 5.9/10, covering 302K workers across 36 occupation groups. Each group is weighted by its share of total employment.
Which jobs are safest from AI in Luxembourg?
Cleaners and helpers has the lowest AI exposure score in Luxembourg at 1.5/10. These roles require physical presence or manual dexterity in unpredictable environments that current AI cannot automate at scale.
When will AI disruption arrive in Luxembourg?
Based on digital infrastructure readiness, Luxembourg scores 9.0/10 for AI Risk Velocity. Disruption imminent (1-3 years). This is derived from World Bank broadband and secure internet server data.
How well can Luxembourg's workforce adapt to AI disruption?
Luxembourg scores 6.7/10 for Workforce Recovery Capacity. Medium resilience - partial safety net. This combines the World Bank Human Capital Index on-the-job learning score and social protection coverage data.
Is automation good or bad for Luxembourg's workforce?
Luxembourg is classified as 'Transition economy'. Moderate aging - automation helps productivity but may strain some sectors. This is based on World Bank old-age dependency ratio and fertility rate data.
Where does the Luxembourg workforce data come from?
The Luxembourg data comes from: Eurostat lfsa_egai2d (Eurostat open dissemination policy); OECD Average Annual Wages (USD PPP, 2024). All data is from official government or intergovernmental sources and is freely available at worldjobsdata.com.
In-depth analysis
Luxembourg - Analysis Coming Soon
We publish country analyses weekly. See what is live →
Stay informed
Get notified when Luxembourg data updates
One email when new country data drops or a country analysis publishes. No spam.
Compare Luxembourg with Other Countries
Explore how AI exposure, wages and workforce composition differ across the world.
Open Luxembourg in the interactive tool → · Browse all 206 countries →